| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Press Release |
|
Herman S D'Souza, Geraldine Menezes, and Venkatesh.T Department
of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Author
for correspondence: ABSTRACT
Our study aimed at comparing lead and zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) levels
in capillary and venous blood samples in a small population and to employ
an easier method of sample collection for a major screening program in
school children in major Indian cities. An awareness program on lead and
its effects was conducted in two different schools. A total of thirty
urban school children from Souith India, with an age group between 4-12
years consented for dual blood sampling and reported for the study. Venous
and capillary blood samples were obtained simultaneously. Blood lead and
zinc protoporphyrin(ZPP) levels were estimated using ESA Lead Analyzer
and Haematofluorometer respectively. A significant correlation between
capillary and venous ZPP(r=0.99) was observed. Rank sum test showed that
there is no statistically significant difference between capillary and
venous ZPP (P=0.891) and lead (P=0.672) values. This pilot study recommends
that screening for lead may be done using capillary blood samples since
significant correlation is observed between capillary and venous blood
measurements. Obtaining samples using this mode is a non-invasive, less
expensive, quick and easy method in children. Approximately performed
capillary sampling may be considered as an acceptable alternative to venipuncture
for screening of blood for lead poisoning both in children and adults.
INTRODUCTION
Lead, the most versatile and commonly available metal has emerged as a
major health hazard with detection of alarming levels of lead among the
Indian population particularly in children. The Center for Disease Control
and Prevention recommended in October 1991, the priority groups for screening
which involved children mainly between 6 to 72 months. They also recommended
that ZPP is not sensitive enough to identify lead poisoning at lower blood
lead levels, that is between 10-25 µg/dl and misses many children
with blood lead 25 µg/dl. Hence ZPP test which has been shown to
be insensitive with lower levels of exposure, be replaced by the direct
measurement of blood lead as the screening test of choice. The major problem
in implementing screening program for children has been obtaining blood
samples. Lead levels can be analyzed using capillary blood samples as
well as venous samples. Obtaining capillary samples is more feasible at
many screening sites. Of concern is the fact that lead levels measured
in capillary samples may not reflect true blood lead levels because of
lead contaminated fingertips. Alternatively venous blood samples can be
used for screening. Collection of venous blood samples poses difficulty,
children are frightened to see the needle and syringes, difficulty in
getting veins to collect blood, and if it is a mass screening, the sampling
procedure is time consuming. It is also difficult to obtain venous sample
collections in some clinical settings. We took up this study in young children, primarily to correlate blood lead levels in capillary samples and simultaneously drawn venous blood samples. This was a pilot study to arrive at the difference in blood lead levels in both types of sampling since we had to carry out screening for a larger population of children for lead poisoning in major Indian cities. Our aim was also to see differences in ZPP levels in both types of sampling since increased high blood ZPP levels is a good indicator of chronic lead exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS An awareness program was conducted by us on lead in schools for, school authorities, teachers and parents. Parents who consented to their children participating in lead screening were informed about dual blood sampling. Patient consent forms were given only to those who agreed for dual blood sampling followed by patient information forms comprising of patient demographics, parent occupation, family size, annual income, residential location, food and play habits and mode of reaching school. 30 school children aged 4 to 12 years belonging to two different schools were selected for the study. Our lead screening program included analysis of blood lead as well as ZPP levels. Children participating in the screening program were asked to wash their hands thoroughly with soap and water and dry them with a clean, low-lint towel. The finger to be punctured was checked for any visible infection or wound and was wiped using spirit swab and allowed to dry. All blood samples were obtained from the children by skilled personnel. For capillary blood sample collection, the fingertip was punctured using disposable lancet. The first drop of blood was discarded followed by transferring the second drop onto a coverslip, taking precautions to see the fingertips does not touch the cover slip. ZPP was estimated immediately by front face flourometry using AVIV Haematoflourometer.100 µl sample was collected in a 100 µl capacity capillary tube, from the same fingertip and added immediately to Metexchange reagent (Chromium chloride 1.07wt%, calcium acetate 1.43wt%, mercuric ion 0.0028 wt%) for the estimation of lead. Subsequent to capillary blood sampling, venous blood sampling was carried out. The site chosen for venous sample collection was thoroughly cleaned using spirit swab, allowed to dry and blood was drawn using a syringe. A drop of blood was transferred to a coverslip and ZPP was measured immediately. 100 µl of the sample was dispensed into Metexchange reagent `as mentioned above. Lead estimations of both capillary and venous samples were carried out after 24 hours by ASV using ESA Lead Analyzer.14 Metexchange reagent, other accessories and 3010B Lead Analyzer were supplied by ESA Inc., MA, U.S.A. AVIV Haematofluorometer from AVIV Biomedical, Inc., (Lakewood, NJ) by " The George Foundation." a non government organization. Statistical analysis carried out included; comparing the study population for age and sex, calculating mean capillary and venous blood lead, mean capillary and venous blood ZPP levels, correlation coefficient and standard deviation of differences. P value was calculated using Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 30 school children with mean age 8.3 (4 - 12 yrs) participated in the study. 26.7% (n=8) of them were males and 73.3% (n=22) were females. Four children had a difference of 12-16 µg/dl in ZPP levels, three children had a difference of 2.9, 4.5 and 16.6 µg/dl in lead levels between capillary and venous samples and hence were eliminated from the study. This would have been due to a technical or analytical error. The analysis could not be repeated due to the nonavailability of the sample. With the elimination of 4 ZPP values from 30, 26 capillary ZPP values showed a significant correlation (r = 0.98) with corresponding venous blood ZPP measurements. Rank Sum Test showed that there is no statistically significant difference (P=0.891) between venous and capillary blood ZPP measurements. Similarly with the elimination of three lead values from thirty, 27 capillary blood lead values showed a significant correlation (r = 0.99) with corresponding venous blood lead measurements. Rank Sum Test showed no statistically significant difference (P=0.672) between venous and capillary blood lead measurements ( Table 1 ). Our study showed excellent correlation of capillary blood lead and ZPP measurements with corresponding venous blood lead and ZPP measurements. We strongly recommend capillary blood sampling for both lead and ZPP estimations. Added advantage is that, it is noninvasive, less expensive and is most acceptable especially in children. Appropriately performed capillary sampling may be an acceptable alternative to venipuncutre for screening children as well as adults for lead poisoning. Based on its ease of performance, capillary sampling may be preferred for mass screening programs. However, if the lead values obtained are very high, and if the patient needs to be subjected for chelation therapy, a confirmatory recheck of blood lead levels with another capillary sample or a venous sample may be necessary. Even though this study was taken up as a pilot study, the lead levels seen in some children were alarmingly high. Patient information form revealed that some of them belonged to poor economic background, others had their parents working in lead based industries or had their houses located near the highway and a few had unusual sources for lead exposure. Our study clearly shows lead poisoning in children in an urban set up. Looking for and finding lead toxicity in a community may be calling attention to a health problem that previously may not have been a concern to the local health care providers. There is a need to provide education about lead toxicity at different levels of the health care system. This study has also highlighted the important role of public health in identifying the sources of lead exposure for a community and in developing appropriate educational materials and for implementing basic control measures. Table
1. |
|
ZPP
|
Lead
|
|
|
n
|
26
|
27
|
|
Capillary
blood-mean ±SD
|
41.31
±11.26
|
14.19
±10.86
|
|
Venous
blood - mean ±SD
|
41.23±12.49
|
13.61±10.55
|
|
Correlation
Coefficient (r)
|
0.98
|
0.99
|
|
P
value
|
0.891
|
0.672
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We sincerely thank " The George Foundation ", Bangalore for supporting this study through the " Project Lead Free." REFERENCES
|