STUDIES
OF LEAD LEVELS IN THE ENVIRONMENT IN INDIA
Dr.
P.K. Seth and Dr. D.K. Saxena
Lead is an ubiquitous
environmental pollutant and its toxic effects in the exposed workers
during recycling processing and refining are well documented. In the
recent past, a growing concern has evidenced on the potential threat
of environmental exposure of lead to ecosystem and human health particularly
in young children and women. The presence of lead beyond permissible
limits in air, water and soil has been reported worldwide. This has
resulted in higher uptake of this metal in the fauna and flora in the
exposed areas. In early days, focus of the research in lead toxicity
was on acute and chronic effects under occupational exposures. The reports
that growing children who are liable to retain excess of this metal
through food chain and air exhibit behavioural and other ailments at
very low levels has led to research for understanding the subtle, chronic
or long term effects where cause and effect relationships are not apparent
or may be sub-clinical. This may include changes in the performance
of the individuals i.e. lower IQ. Attempts have also been made to develop
new sensitive and simple methods for the detection of blood levels.
Strategies adopted to minimise exposure to lead in countries like USA,
Germany and UK have resulted in the lowering of blood level among children.
In India also
steps have long been taken to monitor lead levels in water samples of
major national rivers, food items and other possible sources, which
may contribute lead to the ecosystem and human body. Earlier studies
mostly revealed safe lead levels except in few selected places where
levels were beyond the permissible limit. Presence of lead in the food
items and domestic sources were also found to be due to age-old social
habits and raw materials. Growing concern has aroused at the national
level about the increase in lead levels in the environment due to rapid
industrialisation and sharp increase in petrol driven vehicular traffic.
Monitoring of lead and other heavy metals have been undertaken in India
under an Integrated Environmental Programme on Heavy Metals (IEPHM),
Ganga Action Plan and Rajiv Gandhi National Drinking Water Mission.
In addition, monitoring of lead levels in food materials has also been
undertaken in some states from time to time. Monitoring of the human
blood lead level in Ahmedabad and children and women in some cities
has been undertaken. However, no regular monitoring programme on lead
levels in environment, food sources and blood has been undertaken at
the national level.
Heavy metal
toxicity has been an important area of research at Industrial Toxicology
Research Centre, Lucknow for last three decades. Besides the occupational
health studies, experimental studies on the mechanism of lead intoxication,
factors influencing the lead toxicity and curative aspects have been
undertaken. The institute has played a major role in national programmes
on monitoring of lead level in water and food material. Limited studies
on monitoring of blood lead level of exposed population have also been
undertaken.
Kaphalia et
al (1981) analysed lead levels in water samples collected from various
sources in different sites of India and found lead levels well within
the permissible levels in all the samples except 3% of the samples of
deep tube wells of Pilani. This excess lead level was attributed to
industrial activities in the area (Table No. 1).
A similar trend
of lead levels in roadside urban water supply samples in Lucknow (500
samples) and Kanpur (150 sample) cities were also observed (Seth et
al 1975). All samples contained lead level within the recommended limits
for drinking water (Table No. 2). Israili & Khurshed (1991) also
found lead within permissible limits in up and down stream Yamuna river
samples of Delhi, Mathura, Agra & Allahabad (Table No. 3). Similarly,
the samples from various sites of Ganga river from Rishikesh to Bulandshahar
showed lead levels within the permissible limits (Israili, 1991) (Table
No. 4).
Lead concentration
in submerged plants and fish from various sites of river Ganga were
observed only in downstream sites and in fishes collected at Kanpur,
which was possibly due to discharge of lead containing effluents from
various industries alongside the Ganga river in Kanpur city (Table No.
5) (NEERI, 1987). Recently, Rao et al (1998) showed the presence of
lead in the effluents as well as in the sediments and water of Mehadrigedda
stream of Vishakhapatnam (Table No. 6). In an IEPHM survey in Tamil
Nadu and Kerala more than 60%, and in Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka about
30-50% of the samples analysed showed non-detectable level of lead.
The presence of
lead in drinking water assumes great importance due to a WHO report
bringing down the permissible lead levels in drinking water from 50
mg/l (WHO 1984) to 10 mg/l (WHO 1993).
Survey studies
on lead levels in air in some of the Indian cities have also been carried
out. Sadasivan et al (1987), found high lead levels in samples from
Bombay, Kanpur and Nagpur which are known industrial cities of India
(Table No. 7). In IEPHM survey most of the sample analysed had detectable
levels of lead. In Orissa, Kerala, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, and Bihar
more than 10% of the total number of samples analysed had non-detectable
levels of lead. In Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh 6 to 8% of the samples
had non-detectable lead levels. The highest level of lead observed was
51.82 mg/m3 in a sample collected from Visakhapatnam urban
area. Few samples collected from Uttar Pradesh urban area in the winter
season showed a lead concentration of 26.2 mg/m3, while the
maximum observed levels of lead in samples collected from the Bihar
urban area in summer was 10.1 mg/m3. In all other states,
the maximum concentration observed was less than 6 mg/m3,
which is the acceptable average for urban area. The increased levels
of lead in the above mentioned samples may be due to high traffic density
at the time of the collection of the samples or as in Visakhapatnam,
due to the lead smelting activities.
Lead levels
in food samples collected in Ahmedabad city were found to range from
0.55-1.05, 0.20-1.05, 1.8-2.5 and 0.40-1.25 mg/gm in food grains, vegetables,
fruits and cooked food respectively (Pandya et al 1983) (Table No. 8).
During IEPHM survey, in West Bengal, Orissa and Karnataka, high levels
of lead were observed in all the food constituents. Highest concentration
of lead was observed in the food items including fish collected from
West Bengal. The levels of lead were high in vegetables and spices in
Tamil Nadu and Kerala. In Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat and Rajasthan
the levels of lead in all the food constituents were very low and in
the range reported in literature in other countries. Comparing the intake
among different socio-economic groups of population in South India,
Srikanth et al (1995) suggested that rice could be considered as a source
for higher lead intake in the rural population. However, no clinical
data to indicate food intake related effects of lead on health is reported
from the area (Table No. 9).
Exposure to
lead may also occur through food colours. During a 10 year survey of
coloured foodstuff samples from various parts of Uttar Pradesh, 5 non-permitted
colours namely auramine, Blue VRS, Brilliant Crocein Scarlet, Malachite
Green and Sudan III were found to contain lead levels higher than the
permissible levels (Khanna et al, 1976) (Table No. 10). Cattle &
buffalo milk samples collected from Ahmedabad, Calcutta and Delhi/Ghaziabad
showed 0.27-0.28 ppm lead level, which is higher than the normal bovine
milk lead level range i.e.0.08-0.13ppm (Dwivedi & Swarup,1995)(Table
No.11 ).
Some studies
to assess the body burden of lead have also been undertaken in certain
parts of India in urban populations. In a study by Sen and Chowdhury
(1996) human hair lead levels among 25-35 yrs old male population of
Calcutta in three occupationally unexposed population groups from Jadhavpur,
Rajabazar and Batanagar were found to be within the normal range (Table
No. 12). In a study of the blood lead levels of Bombay residents the
geometric mean was found to be 18.4 (males adults range 12.8-36.7 mg/dl),
16.9 (female adults, range 9.2-24.1 mg/dl), 9.4 (Children 5-12 yrs,
range 1.8-17.4 mg/dl) (Khandeker 1984) (Table No. 13). Varying higher
blood lead levels depending upon the job engaged and length of service
among workers in a mining unit have been reported by Bihari et al (1986)
(Table No. 14). A correlation between the blood lead level and the air
concentration of lead has been reported (1998) (Table No 15). Awasthi
et al (1996) reported mean blood lead of 15.65, 13.64 13.57 and 12.99
mg/dl among women in the different localities of urban slums of Lucknow
(Table No. 16). In a study at Lucknow, mean maternal blood lead level
was found to be significantly higher (P<0.05) in cases of abnormal
delivery (22.52 mg/dl) compared to normal delivery cases (19.4 mg/dl).
Whereas no significant difference in placental cord blood and fetal
membrane lead levels was observed in normal and abnormal delivery cases
(Saxena et al 1994) (Table No. 17).
Detailed experimental
animal studies on factors that enhance the lead uptake in the body and
vitamins and micronutrient that may protect from effects of lead have
been undertaken at ITRC. Iron deficiency, protein deficiency and alcoholism
were found to enhance the absorption of lead. Vitamins and micronutrient
supplementation significantly protected the animals from the adverse
affects of the lead. These studies point out the need for maintenance
of proper nutritional status among children and other population (Table
18-20).
In recent years
at national level, steps taken to control and prevent the environmental
lead exposure include phasing out use of leaded-petrol, developing green
belt around industrial areas and areas of high vehicular traffic and
monitoring of the environmental lead levels. Keeping in view of the
health risks to women and children a comprehensive plan to control,
reduce and prevent lead exposure and intervention strategies is needed.
This would include monitoring of the lead level in water, food and blood
at specified intervals, and health effect assessment of exposed population
particularly women and children, keeping in view of the confounding
factors and assessment of their nutritional status. This would require
interdisciplinary approach, co-ordination at all levels, public awareness
and community involvement. Research in this area needs to focus on understanding
the factors influencing the low-level toxicity of lead, and development
of sensitive portable instruments suitable for measurement of lead in
our environment and exposed individuals.
Table no. 1:
Lead in drinking water
Range wise
% frequency of lead conc.
in different
water samples
|
category
|
<
0.025 mg/l
|
0.026-0.050
mg/l
|
>0.051mg/l
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Tap
water
|
|
|
|
|
Lucknow
|
50
|
25
|
25
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Tubewell
water
|
|
|
|
|
Kanpur
|
84
|
16
|
-
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Tube
well water
|
|
|
|
|
Pilani
|
-
|
24
|
76
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Tubewell
water
|
|
|
|
|
Cambay,
Gujrat
|
55
|
30
|
15
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Gomti
river water
|
30
|
65
|
5
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Tank
water
|
|
|
|
|
Cambay,
Gujrat
|
100
|
-
|
-
|
Source: Kaphalia
et al. Ind. J. Environ. Prot.(1981).
Table no. 2:
Lead levels in urban water supply
|
city
|
range of pb level (mg/l)
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
£
0.001
|
0.001-0.004
|
0.004-0.006
|
0.006-0.05
|
|
Lucknow
|
44.8%
|
46.4%
|
7.2%
|
1.6%
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
³
0.002
|
0.004-0.008
|
0.014-0.018
|
|
|
Kanpur
|
6.7%
|
80%
|
13.3%
|
|
Source: Seth et.
al.,Ind. J.Indus. Med. (1975)
Table no. 3:
|
Sampling
stations
|
|
|
|
pb
(ug/l)
|
|
1.
Delhi (upstream)
|
1.4
|
|
2.
Delhi (downstream)
|
2.51
|
|
3.
Mathura (upstream)
|
6.50
|
|
4.
Mathura (downstream)
|
8.51
|
|
5.
Agra (upstream)
|
2.15
|
|
6.
Agra (downstream)
|
3.15
|
|
7.
Allahabad (upstream)
|
2.12
|
|
8.
Allahabad (downstream)
|
4.45
|
Concentration of
lead in Yamuna river water (Israili & Khurshhed, poll. res.,1991).
permissible limit (ESEPA) 50 ug/l.
Table no. 4
Sampling
sitepb (ug/l)
| |
|
|
1. Rishikesh
|
0.92
|
| |
|
|
2.
Haridwar
|
0.98
|
|
3.
Sultanpur
|
1.30
|
|
4.
Muzaffarnagar
|
1.20
|
|
5.
Meerut (Parichchatgarh)
|
4.50
|
|
6.
Ghaziabad (Garhmukteshwar)
|
6.50
|
|
7.
Bulandshahr
|
2.70
|
|
8.
Buladshahr (Ramghat)
|
2.50
|
Occurrence of lead
(g/l) in Ganga river water in u.p. Israili., Poll. Res., 1991).
permissible limit: 50 ug/l
Table no. 5:
Concentration of lead in submerged plants and fish from Ganga river
|
plants
(g/g)
|
fish
(g/g)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Narora
|
4.80
|
3.83
|
|
|
Kannauj
|
4.00
|
1.44
|
|
|
Kanpur
|
upstream
|
9.80
|
|
| |
downstream
|
13.70
|
21.16
|
|
Fatehpur
|
11.96
|
5.10
|
|
|
Allahabad
|
3.40
|
15.33
|
|
|
Varanasi
upstream
|
7.70
|
14.41
|
|
|
downstream
|
9.60
|
|
|
|
Patna
|
upstream
|
6.00
|
10.25
|
| |
downstream
|
9.20
|
|
Source: River
Ganga: an over view of environmental research. Neeri, Nagpur.,
1987
Table no. 6
|
month
& year
|
sediment
|
water
|
effluents
|
| |
(ug/g)
|
(mg/l)
|
(mg/l)
|
|
Sept,93
|
27.00
|
1.90
|
3.7
|
|
Oct,93
|
26.80
|
0.95
|
1.3
|
|
Nov,93
|
26.31
|
0.03
|
5.6
|
|
Dec,93
|
35.47
|
0.45
|
0.8
|
|
Jan,94
|
46.95
|
0.03
|
3.4
|
|
Feb,94
|
25.66
|
2.23
|
4.2
|
|
Mar,94
|
35.12
|
2.03
|
3.0
|
|
Apr,94
|
47.45
|
1.53
|
4.0
|
|
May,94
|
48.73
|
1.64
|
3.8
|
|
June,94
|
49.21
|
1.44
|
8.5
|
|
July,94
|
45.27
|
1.42
|
9.5
|
|
Aug,94
|
18.39
|
2.22
|
1.6
|
Lead concentration
of effluents, sediments & water in Mehadrigedda stream of Vishakhapatnam
(Rao et al., Poll. Res., 1998).
Table no. 7:
Concentration of pb in air in few cities
pb in air
ug/m3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
city
|
mean+s.d
|
min.
|
max.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Bombay (88)
|
0.21 +
0.20
|
0.02
|
0.83
|
|
Bangalore
(55)
|
0.08 +
0.05
|
0.02
|
0.15
|
|
Nagpur (60)
|
0.15 +
0.01
|
0.04
|
0.68
|
|
Jaipur (62)
|
0.09 +
0.01
|
0.02
|
0.26
|
|
Chandigarh
(33)
|
0.09 +
0.01
|
0.02
|
0.22
|
|
Kanpur (15)
|
0.31 +
0.10
|
0.10
|
1.41
|
|
Coimbatore
(8)
|
0.06 +
0.02
|
0.02
|
0.15
|
Atmospheric lead
levels in some cities in India
(Sadasivan et al.ind.
J.Environ.Hlth., 1987)
Table no. 8:
Lead levels in food samples / cigarettes collected in Ahmedabad
|
Samples
|
mean
conc.(and range) of lead
(ug/gm.)
|
|
food grains
|
0.69 (0.55-1.05)
|
|
vegetables
|
0.74 (0.20-1.05)
|
|
fruits
|
1.8-2.5
|
|
cooked food
|
0.84 ( 0.40-1.25)
|
|
cigarettes
& beedies
|
12.43( 7.37-20.4)
|
(Source: Pandya
et al., J. Environ. Biol.,1983)
Table no. 9
pb intake (ug/day)
|
major
food items
|
Higher
gr.income
|
Middle
gr.income
|
Lower
gr.income
|
Rural
gr.population
|
|
rice
|
60
|
68
|
81
|
101
|
|
idli ravva
|
16
|
16
|
-
|
-
|
|
sujji
|
13
|
13
|
-
|
-
|
|
wheat flour
|
29
|
29
|
-
|
-
|
|
maida
|
8
|
8
|
-
|
-
|
|
sorgham
|
-
|
-
|
33
|
-
|
Role of rice and
cereal products in dietary lead intake among different socio-economic
group in South India. (Srikanth et al., Food Addit. Contam.,1995)
Table no. 10:
Lead in various food colours
|
pb(ppm)
|
|
|
Permitted
colours
|
|
|
Single
|
within permissible
limit
|
|
blends
|
within permissible
limit
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
non-permitted
colours
|
|
|
single
|
|
|
1. auramine
|
15.6
|
|
2. blue vrs
|
18.6
|
|
3. brilliant
crocein scarlet
|
13.8
|
|
4. malachite
green
|
16.4
|
|
5. sudan iii
|
34.2
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
blends
|
within permissible
limit
|
Data of a 10-year
survey of 12575 coloured foodstuff samples from various parts of u.p.
(Khanna et al.,
J Food Sci. Agric, 1976) permissible range - 10 ppm
Table no. 11:
Lead in blood and milk from urban Indian cattle and buffalo
|
urban
area
|
pb conc.in
ppm
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
blood
|
milk
|
| |
(mean+s.e.)
|
(mean+s.e.)
|
| |
|
|
|
Ahmedabad
|
0.04+0.03
|
0.28+0.06
|
|
(27)
|
(14)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Calcutta
|
0.31+0.04
|
0.28+0.05
|
|
(21)
|
(14)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Delhi/
|
0.41+0.06
|
0.27+0.05
|
|
Ghaziabad
|
(18)
|
(9)
|
Figures in parentheses
show number of samples
Normal bovine milk
lead ~ 0.08-0.13 ppm and blood lead~ 0.13 +0.044 ppm (Dwivedi
& Swarup,Vet.Human Toxicol.,1995)
Table no. 12:
Human hair pb levels in 3 occupationally unexposed population
groups in Calcutta
|
area
|
pb
(mg/gm)
|
|
|
| |
Jadavpur
|
Rajabazar
|
Batanagar
|
|
N
|
50
|
50
|
25
|
|
AM
|
4.52
|
6.91
|
3.48
|
|
SD
|
2.92
|
3.04
|
0.81
|
|
Range0.11-12.10
|
2.60-19.16
|
2.10-4.90
|
|
Critical hair pb
level >20.00 mg/g. study included only 25-35yr. old males
(Sen & Choudhury,
Bull. Environ. Contam.Toxicol.,1996)
Table no. 13:
Blood lead levels of Bombay residents
|
Sample
|
no.
of subjects
|
geometricrange
|
mean(ug/dl)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
total
|
45
|
17.7
|
9.2-36.7
|
|
male (adults)
|
23
|
18.4
|
12.8-36.7
|
|
female (adults)
|
22
|
16.9
|
9.2-24.1
|
|
children (5-12
y)
|
26
|
9.4
|
1.8-17.4
|
|
Pune city
|
21
|
12.1
|
4.5-25.0
|
Source:Khandekar
et al., The science of total environment (1984).
Table no. 14:
Blood lead levels among workers engaged in a lead mining unit
|
subject
|
length
of
|
job
requirement
|
blood
lead
|
|
(n)
|
service
(yrs)
|
(ug/dl)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
6
|
8-10
|
drilling
|
53.25 (36.3-72.5)
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
6
|
2-4
|
mining workers
|
53.12 (28.8-87.5)
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2
|
8
|
Underground
Survey
|
23.00 (20.7-25.4)
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
2
|
2-8
|
Fitters
|
58.3 (47.1-69.5)
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
1
|
8
|
pump operator
|
43.7
|
| |
|
|
|
|
4
|
8-12
|
plant attendant
|
64.58 (45.8-88.7)
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
4
|
8-12
|
Crushing plant
|
28.00 (12.0-37.5)
|
| |
|
Worker
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
4
|
2-12
|
Maintenance
|
16.8 (13.8-20.7)
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
5
|
-
|
Controls
|
28.0 (15.0-38.0)
|
Source : Behari
et al., Ind. J. Occup. Hlth. (1986)
Table no. 15
|
areas
|
shahpur
jat (n= 90)
|
daryaganj
(n= 90)
|
| |
(%)
|
(%)
|
| |
(low
air lead area)
|
(high
air lead area)
|
| |
|
|
|
category i
(<10 ug/dl)
|
44.4
|
27.7
|
|
category ii
(10-19 ug
/dl)
|
14.4
|
20.0
|
|
category iii
(20-44 ug
/dl)
|
15.5
|
31.1
|
|
category iv
(45-69 ug
/dl)
|
7.7
|
8.8
|
|
category v
(> 70 ug
/dl)
|
17.7
|
12.2
|
|
mean
|
18+12.8
|
18+8.6
|
Pilot study on
blood lead levels and clinical manifestations in school children of
Delhi.
Table no. 16:
Distribution of blood pb by type of neighbourhood
|
nn
|
slumswomen
|
mean
|
|
|
(n)
|
(n)
|
blood
|
pb (g/dl)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
inner city
|
36
|
197
|
15.65+8.17
|
| |
|
|
|
|
industrial
|
9
|
9413.57+6.40
|
|
|
(with potentiallead
|
|
|
|
|
emission)
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
industrial
|
56412.99+7.14
|
|
|
|
(without potential
|
|
|
|
|
lead emission)
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
near highways
|
20
|
14513.64+8.40
|
|
Blood lead level
in pregnant women in the urban slums of Lucknow (Awasthi et al., Occup.
Environ. Med., 1996)
Table no. 17
|
pb levels
|
n
|
normal
|
n
|
|
abnormal
|
p
|
|
|
| |
delivery
|
delivery
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
maternal184
|
19.40
|
47
|
22.52<0.05
|
|
blood
|
|
|
|
|
(ug/dl)
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
placenta
|
192
|
17.98
|
25
|
|
20.88n.s.
|
|
|
|
|
(ug /100g)
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
cord blood189
|
16.96
|
26
|
16.38n.s.
|
|
(ug /dl)
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
fetal memb-
|
187
|
12.72
|
25
|
|
13.96n.s.
|
|
|
|
|
rane (ug /100
g)
|
|
|
|
Blood and placental
lead levels in an Indian city: A preliminary report (Saxena et al.,
Arch. Environ. Hlth., 1994)
Table no. 18:
Protective role of various agents in lead toxicity
(experimental
studies)
vitamin supplementation
Flora et al.,Z.
Gesamte Hyg,1984
Tandon et al., Ind.
J. Med. Res., 1984
Flora et al., Life
Sci.,1986,
Flora et al., Biol
Trace Elem., 1986,
Tandon et al., Industr.
Hlth., 1987
micronutrient
supplementation
selenium
Flora et al., Acta
Pharmacol.Toxicol., 1983
Tandon et al., Ind.
J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 1992
zinc
Hasan & Seth.,
Toxicol. Lett., 1981
Srivastava &
Tandon, Toxicol Lett., 1984
Anwar et al., Drug
Chem. Toxic., 1988
Flora & Tandon,Toxicology,
1990
Calcium
Anwar et al., Drug
Chem.Toxicol.,1987
Table no. 19:
Predisposing factors in lead toxicity
Protein
deficiency
- increased
embryo and fetotoxicity
- reducedtesticular
enzymes activity
Table no. 20:
Predisposing factors in lead toxicity
Iron deficiency
.enhanced toxic
effects on
neurochemicals/enzymes
.increased accumulation
of lead
.increased embryo
and fetotoxic effects
Reference
Anwar J., Ali, S
and Mehrotra, NK (1987).Protective role of calcium in lead toxicity
during development of chick embryo. Drug. Chem. Toxicol. 10,357-367.
Anwar,J., Ali, S
and Mehrotra, NK ( 1988). Antagonistic effects of zinc in lead treated
developing chickembryos. Drug Chem. Toxicol., 11, 85-95.
Awasthi, A., Awasthi,
R., Pande,VK., Srivastava, RCandFrumkin,H (1996). Blood lead level in
pregnant women in the urban slumsof Lucknow, India., Occup. Environ.
Med., 53,836-840.
Behari, JR., Athar,
M and Srivastava, RC(1986). Lead levelinthe environment and body burden
among workers of lead mines. Ind.J. Occup. Hlth., 29,61-67.
Dwivedi, SK and
Swarup, D (1995). Lead in blood and milk from urban Indian cattle and
buffalo. Vet. Hum. Toxicol., 37,471-472.
Flora, SJS., Singh,
S and Tandon, SK ( 1983). Role of selenium in protectionagainst lead
intoxication. Acta Pharmacol.Toxicol., 53,28-32.
Flora, SJS.,Singh,
Sand Tandon, SK (1984).Prevention oflead intoxication by Vitamin B complex.
Z. Gesamte Hyg., 30,409-411.
Flora, SJS.,Singh,
Sand Tandon, SK (1986). Chelation in metal intoxication.XVIII combined
effects of thiamineandcalcium disodium versenate on lead toxicity. Life
Sci., 38,67-71.
Flora, SJSandSharma,RP(1986).Influence
ofdietary supplementation with thiamine on lead intoxication in rats.
Biol. Trace Elemen. 10,137-144.
Flora,SJSand Tandon,
SK (1990). Beneficialeffectsofzinc supplementationduring chelation treatment
of leadintoxication in rats. Toxicology., 64,129-139.
Hasan,MZandSeth,TD(1981).Effect
ofleadand zinc administration on liver, kidney and brain levels of copper,
lead, manganese and zinc and on erythrocyteALA-Dactivity in rats. Toxicol.
Lett., 7, 353-358.
Israili, AW (1991).
The occurrence of heavy metals in Ganga river water and sediments of
western Uttar Pradesh., Poll. Res., 10,103-109.
Israili, AW and
Khurshid, S (1991). Distribution of heavy metals in Yamuna river water
and sediments from Delhi and Allahabad.Poll. Res., 10,215-222.